|
Activities Potentially Affecting the Biotope Complex
Other pollutants
Introduced species
Other pollutants
There are no recorded cases of biotopes within this complex being
seriously impacted by pollution processes other than organic enrichment, but on general
biological principles it can be assumed that the various forms of contaminant shown to
damage other benthic communities could also have adverse effects on the systems discussed
here. Potentially harmful contaminants could include oil or oil-based drilling muds,
pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and heavy metals.
Specific examples of known sensitivity to pollutants are rare, probably
because burrowing megafauna are generally too difficult to sample to be included in
standard pollution monitoring studies. In the North Sea, Daan et al. (1992) found that Callianassa
subterranea decreased in density towards drilling sites contaminated by oil-based
muds. Distribution patterns suggested that this was one of the more sensitive species in
the sediment fauna, and experienced environmental stress even at distances of 1 - 2 km
from the contaminant source. Following the wreck of the oil tanker Braer off the
coast of Shetland in 1993, a fishery exclusion zone was established in the contaminated
area. At present, Nephrops norvegicus is the only species for which this closure
still operates (C.J. Chapman, personal communication). The low water currents associated
with muddy sediments makes this type of habitat highly vulnerable to pollutants, which may
persist in the environment for several years.
In the Scottish salmon farming industry, a variety of chemical
compounds have been used to combat infestation of the fish by parasitic crustaceans
(salmon lice), and there has been concern about the possible effects of these
pesticides on the benthic fauna. Ivermectin, an anti-louse treatment now coming into use
within the industry, has recently been shown to be highly toxic to sediment-dwelling
polychaetes (Black et al., 1997; Thain et al., 1997) and epibenthic shrimps (Burridge et
al., 1993). It is reasonable to suppose that ivermectin (and perhaps other compounds used
in the industry) might also be toxic to burrowing megafauna in the vicinity of salmon
farms. In Washington State, USA, the pesticide carbamyl has been used to control
populations of thalassinidean mud-shrimps whose activities are detrimental to the survival
of cultivated oysters (Brooks, 1993).
Communities containing sea pens and abundant burrowing megafauna exist
in the north-eastern Irish Sea in areas heavily contaminated by past discharges of
long-lived radionuclides from the British Nuclear Fuels Plc reprocessing plant at
Sellafield, Cumbria (Hughes & Atkinson, 1997). No obvious effects of Sellafield
discharges could be observed here, although the burrowing fauna probably have a major
influence on the distribution of radionuclides within the sediments (Kershaw et al.,
1983).
In Nova Scotia, Pemberton et al. (1976) found that the extremely
deep-burrowing mud-shrimp Axius serratus was most abundant in highly polluted
sediments adjacent to urban, industrialised shores, areas barren of living foraminiferans,
molluscs and ostracods. These observations suggest that the animal is one of the more
pollution-tolerant members of the local benthic fauna, contrasting with the findings on
North Sea Callianassa quoted above. The apparent diversity of responses and
physiological abilities within the general category of burrowing megafauna
highlights the need for more research into the effects of environmental pollution on these
animals.
Introduced species
There is currently increasing concern about the effects on marine
ecosystems arising from the introduction of non-native species, this process often
occurring accidentally as a result of human activities (eg. transport in ships
ballast water) (Carlton, 1996). To date, a number of non-native species have become
established in British waters, some very locally, others distributed more widely (Eno et
al., 1997). The biotopes discussed here have not yet been subject to any biological
invasions, but there is always the potential for this to occur.
Next Section
References
|