Zinc
Entry into the marine environment
Zinc is used in coating to protect iron and steel,
in alloys for die casting, in brass, in strips for
dry batteries, in roofing and in some print processes.
It may enter the aquatic environment through natural
or anthropogenic sources, including sewage and industrial
discharges.
Recorded levels in the environment
Concentrations of zinc have been measured in water,
sediments and biota as part of the National Monitoring
Programme at sites throughout the UK in estuaries
and coastal waters (MPMMG 1998). The results of
the National Monitoring Programme are summarised
in Appendix D. MPMMG should be consulted for further
details.
Grimwood and Dixon (1997) compiled available monitoring
data for zinc in water, sediments and biota for
marine sites of nature conservation importance in
England.
As an example of the recorded levels of dissolved
zinc in the marine environment, the following concentrations
have been reported by DETR (1998) for some English
estuaries (see tables below).
Minimum concentration (µg
l-1) of dissolved zinc in the water column
of some English estuaries (from DETR 1998)
|
1991
|
1992
|
1993
|
1994
|
1995
|
Tyne |
22.0
|
8.4
|
9.2
|
20.0
|
0.0
|
Wear |
32.0
|
5.1
|
7.9
|
18.1
|
0.0
|
Tees |
2.7
|
0.0
|
7.7
|
5.0
|
0.0
|
Ouse |
|
5.3
|
5.5
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
Wash |
|
0.0
|
36.0
|
7.7
|
0.0
|
Thames |
0.0
|
8.0
|
7.0
|
10.9
|
14.6
|
Tamar |
0.0
|
|
|
4.7
|
2.7
|
Average concentration (µg
l-1) of dissolved zinc in the water column
of some English estuaries (from DETR 1998)
|
1991
|
1992
|
1993
|
1994
|
1995
|
Tyne |
161.8
|
29.9
|
28.0
|
88.0
|
28.6
|
Wear |
92.3
|
18.9
|
17.1
|
67.7
|
5.1
|
Tees |
50.9
|
26.9
|
14.4
|
74.2
|
50.6
|
Ouse |
|
28.7
|
15.7
|
19.1
|
0.0
|
Wash |
|
0.0
|
36.0
|
28.0
|
0.0
|
Thames |
41.0
|
22.1
|
19.0
|
26.1
|
30.6
|
Tamar |
12.4
|
|
|
8.2
|
7.4
|
Maximum concentration (µg
l-1) of dissolved zinc in the water column
of some English estuaries (from DETR 1998)
|
1991
|
1992
|
1993
|
1994
|
1995
|
Tyne |
478.0
|
64.0
|
44.5
|
296.0
|
50.0
|
Wear |
203.0
|
42.0
|
22.0
|
346.0
|
16.0
|
Tees |
212.0
|
220.0
|
23.0
|
397.0
|
417.0
|
Ouse |
|
103.0
|
36.0
|
112.0
|
0.0
|
Wash |
|
0.0
|
36.0
|
67.9
|
0.0
|
Thames |
85.0
|
43.0
|
30.0
|
52.1
|
71.3
|
Tamar |
110.0
|
|
|
18.2
|
19.5
|
Fate and behaviour in the marine
environment
Zinc is one of the most ubiquitous and mobile of
the heavy metals and is transported in natural waters
in both dissolved forms and associated with suspended
particles (Mance and Yates 1984) In river water,
zinc is predominantly present in the dissolved form.
In estuaries, where concentrations of suspended
particles are greater, a greater proportion of the
zinc is adsorbed to suspended particles (CCREM 1987).
In low salinity areas of estuaries, zinc can be
mobilised from particles by microbial degradation
of organic matter and displacement by calcium and
magnesium. In the turbidity maximum, zinc associated
with suspended sediment will be deposited with flocculated
particles where it can accumulate particularly in
anaerobic sediments. In seawater, much of the zinc
is found is dissolved form as inorganic and organic
complexes.
Effects on the marine environment
Toxicity to marine organisms
An exhaustive literature review on the toxicity
of zinc to marine organisms has not been carried
out for the purposes of this profile. The information
provided in this section is taken from existing
review documents (Mance and Yates 1984, Hunt and
Hedgecott 1992 and Grimwood and Dixon 1997). The
most sensitive groups of organisms have been identified.
Mance and Yates (1984) reviewed data on the toxicity
of zinc to marine organisms. The authors found invertebrates
to be generally more sensitive than the fish species
studies, while, effects on marine macro and microalgae
were noted at concentrations slightly lower than
reported for invertebrates. They also reported a
complicating factor was the apparent development
of increased tolerance. Hunt and Hedgecott (1992)
reported the toxicity and bioaccumulation of zinc
to be greater at lower salinity.
Mance and Yates (1984) proposed an EQS (for the
protection of saltwater life) of 40 µg
l-1 (expressed as a dissolved annual
average concentration), which is currently adopted
in UK legislation (HMSO 1989). The EQS was established
by applying an arbitrary factor of 4 to a 96 hour
LC50 of 166 µg l-1 reported
at that time for the mysid shrimp Mysidopsis
bahia. However, following a review of more recent
toxicity data, Hunt and Hedgecott (1992) proposed
a more stringent EQS to DoE of 10 µg l-1.
This value (also expressed a dissolved annual average)
was based on the lowest, most reliable NOECs reported
for a range of organisms (7 - 20 µg l-1).
Grimwood and Dixon (1997) reviewed data on the
saltwater toxicity of zinc following the Hunt and
Hedgecott review and found only one study had been
reported that perhaps indicated higher toxicity
to saltwater organisms. Exposing the calanoid copepod
Temora stylifera to zinc chloride, Nipper
et al (1993) reported 48 hour LC50s ranging
from 30 - 40 µg l-1, following
exposure in saltwater of salinity 28 - 32 ppt. In
addition, an LC50 as low as 4 µg l-1
was reported on exposure in saltwater of 23 ppt
salinity. However, the authors concluded that this
value should be treated with caution as there was
also an unacceptable level of mortality in the control
organisms. NOECs were not determined, although since
the LC50s are lower than those reported for any
other copepod species, it is conceivable that the
NOECs may also be lower.
While the above data gave cause for concern, Grimwood
and Dixon concluded that in the absence of a measured
NOEC (the above are nominal concentrations), it
was difficult to assess the implications of these
values for the existing EQS. Furthermore, Temora
stylifera is not indigenous to the UK. Moreover,
any decrease in the revised EQS of 10 µg l-1
would lead to a value below Abackground@
levels of zinc in saltwaters.
Grimwood and Dixon recommended that the revised
EQS of 10 µg l-1 (dissolved
annual average) proposed to DoE is appropriate for
the protection of all saltwater life, although where
there was concern that the health of communities
in sites of nature conservation importance may be
compromised as a result of the presence of particularly
sensitive species (e.g. mollusc communities and
sensitive copepods), a lower value may be used as
a guideline. However, in the absence of a suitable
toxicity dataset, it was not possible to make any
recommendations on such a value. This is particularly
pertinent considering that if the EQS is lowered
any further, the value would be at a level below
background concentrations.
Sediment-dwelling organisms
Zinc accumulates in sediments and can pose a hazard
to sediment dwelling organisms at concentrations
above 124 mg kg-1, according to Canadian
interim marine sediment quality guidelines.
Bioaccumulation
Zinc is an essential element for many marine organisms
and, as such, is readily bioaccumulated. Several
species of crustacean are able to regulate the uptake
of zinc but, at higher concentrations, this process
appears to breakdown leading to an influx of zinc.
These issues complicate the calculation of bioconcentration
factors which can be misleading. Organisms can take
up zinc which is reflected in the BCF but the concentrations
in the tissues are of no toxicological significance.
Highest concentrations of zinc reported by Hunt
and Hedgecott (1992) were: 300 - 9700 Fg
g-1 (dry weight) in Fucus vesiculosus;
605 - 619 µg g-1 in Littorina
littorea; 16460 µg g-1
in Elminius modestus and 2800 µg
g-1 in dogfish.
Potential effects on interest
features of European marine sites
Potential effects include:
- acute toxicity to algae, invertebrates and fish
above the proposed EQS of 10 µg l-1
(annual average) for dissolved zinc;
- accumulation in sediments and can pose a hazard
to sediment-dwelling organisms at concentrations
above 124 mg kg-1, according to Canadian
interim marine sediment quality guidelines;
- bioaccumulation in marine organisms posing a
potential threat to fish, birds and Annex II sea
mammals.
Next Section
References
|