|
Dredging
and disposal
Background
Dredging and disposal in marine SACs
Background
Why dredge?
Dredging is a fundamental activity
for most, but not all, ports and harbours. The Central
Dredging Association states that "in its simplest
form dredging consists of the excavation of material
from the sea, river or lakebed, and the relocation
of the excavated material elsewhere for disposal"
(IADC/CEDA 1997). In ports and harbours dredging
can be undertaken to meet a number of different
objectives, which include the following:
- Navigation: to maintain or improve/extend navigable
depths in ports, harbours, marinas and shipping
channels which is usually a statutory requirement
for port and harbour authorities.
- Flood control: to improve drainage or
sea defence.
- Construction and reclamation: in support of
coastal development or for the provision
of foundations for civil engineering works, for
example barrages, bridge piers and pipelines.
- Mining/Aggregate: to win minerals and aggregate
materials from underwater locations (Aggregate
extraction is the subject of a further report
of the UK Marine SACs Project).
- Beach nourishment: to supply material to reinstate
or improve the performance of a beach as a sea
defence or an amenity.
- Environmental: to improve and clean up the environment,
generally for the removal of contaminated sediments
which is commonly called remedial dredging.
Dredging for navigation purposes encompasses two
main types, maintenance
and capital dredging.
The main difference associated with these definitions
relates to the renewal of existing consents and
the application for new consents for the disposal
of dredged material. The main reason a distinction
is applied by the consenting authorities concerns
the physical characteristics of the dredged material
and how, or if, it will disperse during its disposal
or beneficial placement and subsequently move away
from the disposal site. Generally for capital dredging,
there is unlikely to be as much information available
about the characteristics of the material and an
additional assessment is made to determine the potential
environmental impacts and the predicted pattern
of dispersal away from the disposal site.
In their guidance on European marine sites in England
and Wales, DETR/Welsh Office describe dredging and
disposal as an example of an activity which might
occur in European sites (DETR & WO 1998). However
disposal of dredged material is subject to consent
and licensing, and therefore also falls into the
definition of a project and plan which is "in
general, any operation which requires an application
to made for specific statutory consent, authorisation,
licence or other permission".
This section of the guidelines focuses on routine
maintenance dredging in ports and harbours that
will be managed under the marine SAC management
scheme. Ports generally have a statutory responsibility
to maintain navigation for port users. This remit
includes dredging to keep the navigational channels
open and may include commercial agreements to maintain
the channel at a certain depth for a specific customer.
It is therefore imperative for ports, harbours and
marinas to carry out dredging when necessary.
Capital dredging for new port, harbour and marina
developments, includes the construction, extension
or deepening of berths and navigation channels for
access by larger vessels. These operations will,
in general, require consent under the Harbours Act
1964 (or equivalent local Act) and will therefore
be subject to the Assessment of Environmental Effects
Regulations. Capital dredging will generally not
be considered within the SAC management plan and
is therefore not considered in these guidelines.
However, the impacts of different types of navigation
dredging can be generic to some extent, and case
studies of capital dredging will be discussed where
considered relevant to the development of SAC management
plans.
Dredging and disposal
in marine SACs
Between 20 and 40 million tonnes of material is
dredged from English and Welsh ports, harbours and
their approach channels every year, and in 1994
the amounts dredged were estimated at some 40 million
tonnes (Lee et al 1995). However, the levels
of dredging that take place varies greatly from
port to port and from year to year. For example,
whilst Milford Haven may only have a minimum requirement
to undertake maintenance dredging in some years,
in others the oil companies in the Haven have dredged
substantial amounts. The variation in dredging effort
in ports and harbours across the UK is indicated
in the table below, which provides estimates of
the amounts of material dredged per year in selected
SACs.
For example, the ports of the Severn Estuary were
reported to dredge around 4.5 million tonnes of
sediments in a typical year (Severn Estuary Strategy
1997), whereas in Strangford Lough only 2,000 tonnes
were dredged a year (Portaferry Harbour personal
communication 1998). In contrast, no dredging is
undertaken at Millbay Docks and Sutton Harbour in
Plymouth Sound, although small amounts of maintenance
dredging activity is undertaken within the Dockyard
Port of Plymouth.
In addition to undertaking maintenance dredging
to improve or extend navigable depths in ports,
harbours, marinas and shipping channels, it is also
an important activity in the vicinity of lock and
dock gates to ensure there is efficient operation
and continued access to dry docks and basins.
Indication of the variation in dredging effort in or
near selected UK marine SACs
Marine SAC
|
Port
|
Total estimated amounts of
material dredged
|
Fal and Helford
(England)
|
Falmouth
Penryn
Truro
|
3,000-4,000 m3
per year
|
Morecambe Bay
(England)
|
Barrow
Fleetwood
Heysham
Lancaster
|
1,270,000 2,670,000
m3 per year 1
|
Pembrokeshire Islands
(England)
|
Milford Haven
Pembroke Dock
|
50,000 m3 per year
|
Plymouth Sound and
Estuaries
(England)
|
Cattewater Harbour
Millbay Docks
Sutton Harbour
|
None
|
|
Dockyard Port of Plymouth
|
Very small amounts of maintenance
dredging per year
|
Severn Estuary
(England/Wales)
|
Avonmouth
Bristol
Cardiff
Barry
Newport
Sharpness
Gloucester
Watchet
|
3,460,000 m3 per
year 1
|
Strangford
Lough
(Northern Ireland)
|
Strangford
Portaferry
|
1,500 m3 per year
1
|
1 converted from tonnes
assuming that the material has a density of 1,300kg/m3
In the UK, the majority of material from maintenance
dredging is disposed of at sea at about 150 licensed
disposal sites (MAFF 1996; IMO 1997). Quantities
of maintenance dredgings disposed to sea in England
and Wales varied from 17.6 34.1 million wet
tonnes between 1985 and 1993 (Murray 1994a). Gradual
reductions in the amounts of material disposed of
at sea have resulted from changes in port operations
and dredging practices and the increased use of
beneficial options for the disposal of sediments.
Less than a quarter of UK marine SACs have disposal
sites located in or near the site. These include
four UK Marine SAC Project sites, namely Morecambe
Bay, Fal and Helford, Solway Firth and The Wash,
and a further seven sites, Moray Firth, Flamborough
Head, Essex Estuaries, Thanet Coast, Solent Maritime,
Severn Estuary, and the Pembrokeshire Islands. The
amount of maintenance dredgings disposed within
or near these sites varies greatly, as does the
nature of the various disposal sites.
In recent years, all applicants for sea disposal
licences for dredged material in the UK have been
required to consider whether the material can be
managed in such a way to derive environmental or
other benefits or the potential for beneficial use
of the material. Dredged material from ports and
harbours have been put to a range of beneficial
uses, including construction, agricultural and environmental
uses. A number of ports and harbours within or near
marine SACs are considering the feasibility of using
dredged material for intertidal recharge schemes
and saltmarsh restoration schemes. Small-scale schemes
of this kind have been undertaken on an experimental
basis at over 15 locations along the south east
coast of England, including a number within the
Essex Estuaries SAC. The Port of Truro has also
been investigating the feasibility of mixing dredge
spoil with china clay waste to produce a soil substitute
for use in land reclamation on contaminated sites.
Whilst intertidal recharge schemes can provide
long-term benefits of environmental enhancement
and protection, the act of placing material over
existing intertidal habitats has the potential to
cause the same short-term impacts of any disposal
operation, generally associated with smothering
and increased suspended solids. In recognition of
the dual nature of intertidal recharge schemes they
are discussed both as an impact of the disposal
of maintenance dredgings and as a means of addressing
potential impacts arising from dredging operations.
Existing
regulations for dredging and disposal
Environmental impacts of maintenance dredging and disposal
Means of avoiding, minimising and addressing the potential impacts
of maintenance dredging and promoting benefits
Summary
Good
practice
|