Port and Harbour Operations
Potential issues, key processes & potential
impacts
|
Considerations
and comments
|
Potential impacts on marine SACs
Beneficial
Minimal
Adverse
|
Possible means of avoiding, minimising and
addressing impacts
|
Issue: Removal of marine species at dredge
site
Key process: Physical damage (extraction)
Potential impact: Dredging causes
the removal of benthic animals at the dredge
site.
|
The removal of benthic animals is unavoidable,
however the communities within regularly dredged
channels are likely to be degraded and there
is relatively rapid recovery.
|
Min
|
Consider timing of dredge to avoid sensitive
periods for benthic communities in the maintained
channels.
|
Issue: Impacts of reduced water water quality
at the dredge site
Key process: Physical damage (siltation)
Non-toxic contamination (suspended sediments,
turbidity & organic/nutrient enrichment)
Toxic contamination
Potential impact: Dredging and disposal
causes temporary increases in the level of
suspended sediments in the water column which
can give rise to increased turbidity, and
the possible release of oxygen depleting substances
(organic or anaerobic sediments), nutrients
and contaminants.
The potential effects of these changes on
marine life are:
- Temporary reduction of algal/plant growth
due to increased turbidity.
- Disturbance to sensitive benthic animals
and fish due suspended sediments, which
may cause temporary disruption of migration
of fish.
- Temporary disturbance of marine animals
from the depletion of oxygen due to release
of organic-rich material.
- Nutrient enrichment possibly causing increased
food supplies/algal blooms.
- Uptake of contaminants by marine life
possibly causing direct toxic effects or
effects further up the food chain.
- Smothering of benthic animals and plants
due to resettlement of suspended sediments.
|
The suspension of sediments is inevitable,
the extent depends on magnitude and frequency
of dredging, background water quality, type
of material, methods used, channel size and
depth, hydrodynamics and the proximity of
marine features and sensitive communities.
The effects tend to be short term (<1 week
after dredge activity) and near-field (<1km
from activity). Dredging often generates no
greater suspended sediments than natural events
or other human activities.
Depends on background water quality, and
proximity of algae/plants.
Depends on background water quality, proximity
of sensitive species, sediment type and timing.
Only when dredging sediments with high organic
content or very anaerobic sediments.
Depends on sediment and water quality.
Depends on sediment quality (most dredged
material not polluted, generally low level
contaminants).
Some smothering inevitable, depends on hydrodynamic
conditions and proximity of sensitive species.
|
Min
Min/Adv
Min
Min
Min/Adv
Min/Adv
|
Select appropriate dredger to minimise resuspension
of sediments.
Consider timing to dredge and disposal at
most favourable points in the tidal cycle
to limit extent of effects.
Use silt curtains where practicable.
Consider timing of dredging to avoid sensitive
periods for marine animals.
|
Issue: Impacts at the disposal site
Key process: : Physical damage (siltation
& smothering)
Toxic contamination
Non-toxic contamination (suspended sediments,
turbidity & organic/nutrient enrichment)
Potential impact: Disposal of dredged
material at sea causes smothering of benthic
communities at the disposal site and may cause
disturbance and damage to adjacent subtidal
and intertidal communities from increased
suspended sediments (possibly containing contaminants,
organic matter and nutrients) and smothering
(see above). Disposal of dredged material
may lead to the creation of new subtidal or
intertidal habitat, either inadvertently (see
below) or through planned sediment recharge
schemes.
|
Smothering is inevitable at disposal site.
The communities within regularly used sites
are often degraded. Extent of impacts depends
on the magnitude and frequency of disposal,
background water quality, type and quality
of material, size and depth of receiving area,
hydrodynamics and the proximity of marine
features and sensitive communities. The finer
the material and greater the energy at the
disposal site, the higher possibility of increased
suspended sediments and far-field effects.
Potential impacts are minimised under the
FEPA licensing process.
|
Ben/Min/
Adv
|
Consider alternative beneficial use options
to reduce amounts of material disposed at
sea.
Select BPEO disposal sites.
The potential effects at the disposal site
are minimised under the FEPA licensing process.
|
Issue: Changes in hydrodynamics and geomorphology
at dredge and disposal sites
Issue: Changes in hydrodynamics and
geomorphology at dredge & disposal sites.
Key process: Changes to physical
regime (bathymetry, tidal flows, currents,
waves & sediment transport)
Erosion & accretion
Potential impact: Alteration of bathymetry,
tidal currents and sediment-transport processes
in the dredge and disposal areas, may cause
the alteration of erosion and sedimentation
patterns in adjacent areas, which may result
in erosion, or creation of intertidal and
subtidal habitat.
|
Impacts are site specific and very difficult
to isolate from other natural or man-induced
causes (for example sea level rise or reclamation).
Effects depend on the scale and frequency
of dredge and disposal, and the local conditions
at the dredge and disposal site (overall system
size, hydrodynamics and sediment-transport
processes). Adverse effects are more commonly
associated with capital dredging. Generally
impacts on geomorphology are little understood
and need studying.
|
Min
Min/Adv
|
Consider site capacity for sediment containment
or dispersal when selecting a disposal site.
Consider the disposal of sediments within
the system where it is the best practical
environmental option.
Consider and undertake where possible beneficial
use schemes for habitat creation/restoration.
|