Estimation of nutrient loadings to the Fleet lagoon
from diffuse sources
Background and methodology
Summary of results
Further work
Background and methodology
The objective for this investigation carried out
by WRc for the Environment Agency was to >estimate
nutrient loadings from diffuse sources to the Fleet
lagoon, including those arising from the swannery= (Mainstone & Parr 1999).
The topographical catchment of the Fleet is small
(28 km2), stretching along the length
of the Fleet. Much of the catchment is under pasture,
with sheep and dairy farming being important land
uses. Arable farming is concentrated around the
village of Langton Herring and in scattered areas
largely to the south and east. At Abbotsbury Swannery,
at the extreme western end of the Fleet, mute swans
have been managed for around 600 years. This history
of management has led to the development of a large
breeding colony (around 150 pairs) in the 50 acre
reed bed of the swannery, accompanied by a large
flock (approximately 350) of non-breeding birds.
In winter, numbers increase to around 1500 as birds
from other areas fly in.
Freshwater inputs enter the Fleet from seven small
streams, with further inputs from direct runoff
along the lagoon shore. Groundwater seepage may
also be a substantial though uncertain input given
the presence of chalk and greensand aquifers (water
bearing rock strata) underlying the whole area.
Any estimate of diffuse loads produced from export
coefficients needs to be calibrated in some way
against measured loads in the receiving waters.
This requires that point source loads are also estimated
and the sum of point and non-point source estimates
are compared with observed loads entering the lagoon.
Export coefficients may then need to be adjusted
to provide a better fit with measured loads. Five
stages to producing the nutrient budget may therefore
be identified (Mainstone and Parr 1999):
- estimating point source nutrient loads;
- estimating diffuse nutrient loads;
- estimating nutrient loads in waters entering
the Fleet;
- comparing nutrient loads estimated by export
coefficients with loads estimated from receiving
water monitoring;
- modifying export coefficients if necessary.
Annual nutrient budgets were constructed for both
nitrogen and phosphorus. No assessment of the seasonality
or bioavailability of the nutrient loads was made
during this study (see table below). MAFF agricultural
census information on crop areas and livestock numbers
for three parishes within the catchment area of
the Fleet was used, and data on bird (particularly
swan) populations and estimated loads were incorporated.
The above estimates for diffuse sources of nutrients
(combined with estimates for point sources) were
calibrated against measured loads for the Fleet.
Point sources:
Estimated loads for point sources (consisting of
two public sewage treatment works at Abbotsbury
and Langton Herring, and two private sewage treatment
works at Moonfleet Manor Hotel and Royal Engineers
Training Camp at Chickerell) were necessarily crude,
due to a lack of sufficiently detailed information
on flows and nutrient concentrations of sewage effluent
from these works. The results indicated that the
loads from the two private works were negligible,
and that Abbotsbury sewage treatment works contributes
a much larger load than that from Langton Herring
(1.19-2.90 tonnes N per year and 0.38-1.19 tonnes
P per year at Abbotsbury, compared to 0.35 and 0.10
per year respectively for Langton Herring).
Diffuse source:
Loads estimated were from atmospheric deposition,
agriculture, bird populations and groundwater. As
with the estimations of loads from point sources,
there were considerable sources of error for each
of the estimates from diffuse sources.
Atmospheric deposition:
Background nutrient loads from atmospheric deposition
were estimated at 18.48 tonnes per year for nitrogen,
and 0.42 tonnes per year for phosphorus (the latter
is based on the whole catchment).
There are two possible methods for calculating
the nitrogen loading using the information available,
one assumes a fixed proportion of modelled atmospheric
deposition is exported to surface waters whilst
the other uses the proportion of rainfall which
is lost to surface runoff. Partly because of the
complex geology of the catchment, the two methods
give estimates that are an order of magnitude apart.
Therefore, a mean of the two values obtained has
been used.
Agriculture:
Data on agricultural land is typically only available
for aggregated groups of parishes. In the case of
the Fleet, the relevant aggregation covered a much
larger area than the topographical catchment. Fortunately,
three of the parishes constituted 80% of the catchment
area of the Fleet, and MAFF was able to separate
out data for these three parishes, although data
for some crops and livestock was not provided on
this basis due to commercial confidence constraints
on its use. The catchment is predominantly under
pasture (70%), supporting sheep and dairy farming.
24% of farm holdings were devoted to arable, with
most of this under cereal crops (predominantly wheat,
with significant amounts of winter barley and maize).
Data on pig and poultry numbers were withheld. Estimations
of nutrient inputs from the various types of agriculture
were made using assumptions about fertiliser use
for different crops and rates of loss to receiving
waters. The calculations produced estimates of 64
tonnes of N and 0.8 tonnes of P per year exported
to the Fleet from agricultural fertiliser use and
44 tonnes N and 1.5 tonnes P derived from livestock.
Bird populations:
Colonial breeding in mute swans as occurs at Abbotsbury
is traditionally accompanied by high juvenile mortality,
as families leave the nest early, and cygnets fail
to >imprint=
properly on the parents. To assist successful imprinting,
swans are fed at the nest with grass clippings (from
the swannery lawns) in floating dustbin lids. The
non-breeding flock represents a threat to the breeding
colony, as if these birds were to descend on the
breeding colony, it is likely that the ensuing havoc
would result in high juvenile mortalities. The flock
is therefore distracted during nesting time by supply
of wheat grain away from the reed bed. Wheat is
delivered directly to the water and ingested by
the birds off the lagoon bed. Feed is not normally
supplied to the overwintering flock, except in exceptionally
cold weather.
The inputs of nutrients to the Fleet from the swans
were estimated by using the nutrient load delivered
to the swans in feed (whole wheat, crumbs and pellets),
and applying a conversion efficiency to estimate
the loads generated in excreta. Figures of 0.25-0.29
tonnes N and 0.05-0.06 tonnes P per year from swan
feeding were obtained by this method.
Loads from other bird species in the Fleet (Canada
geese, Brent geese, and lesser black-backed, common,
black headed and herring gulls) were estimated using
monthly counts to obtain bird numbers, multiplied
by figures for nutrients in faeces obtained from
the literature. Inputs to the Fleet of 0.17 tonnes
N and 0.06 tonnes P were obtained by this method
for birds other than mute swans.
Groundwater:
Figures for nutrient loads from groundwater could
not be quantified due to lack of information on
both nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations in groundwaters
within the catchment. However, this source of nutrients
is potentially significant and cannot be ignored,
particularly for nitrogen as Environment Agency
borehole data indicate that total inorganic nitrogen
(TIN) concentrations from groundwaters to the north
and west of the catchment are high (around 6 mg/l
TIN).
Streams:
Comparisons were made between the estimates of
loadings obtained by the above methods with nutrient
loadings measured for the Fleet. Unfortunately,
there were no flow data for the seven small streams
entering the Fleet, so flows had to be estimated
using the Institute of Hydrology=s
Micro Low Flow methodology. Nutrient data for the
streams were also sparse due to the fragmentation
of the riverine load to the Fleet into a number
of minor watercourses which would not normally receive
much monitoring attention. There was a discrepancy
between the calculated loads for phosphorus from
the various sources and the calculated loads in
the streams, which could be due to a number of reasons,
but is probably due to the low accuracy of the methods
for estimating both the theoretical inputs and the
measured inputs from the streams. Agreement between
the two methods for nitrogen was good.
NB: Micro Low Flows is a piece of software developed
by the Institute of Hydrology, particularly for
catchments subject to artificial influences such
as impoundment, discharges and abstraction, to allow
the estimation of natural low flows at ungauged
sites.
Summary of estimated annual nutrient loads to the
Fleet
Source
|
Nigrogen
|
Phosphorus
|
Tonnes/year
|
%
|
Tonnes/year
|
%
|
Point sources (sewage
works) |
1.5-3.2
|
1 - 2.5
|
0.48-1.29
|
12 B 39
|
Livestock |
44.4
|
34
|
1.54
|
37 B 47
|
Fertiliser application |
64.4
|
49 B 50
|
0.75
|
18 B 23
|
Background load |
18.5
|
14
|
0.42
|
10 B 13
|
Abbotsbury swannery |
0.3
|
0.2
|
0.06
|
2
|
Other bird species |
0.2
|
0.1
|
0.06
|
2
|
TOTAL |
129.3 B 131.0
|
|
3.31 B 4.12
|
|
Source: Mainstone & Parr 1999
Summary of results:
Although there were concerns over the reliability
of a number of aspects of the data on which the
estimates were based, agricultural sources were
found to be highly important for both nitrogen and
phosphorus. Around 80% of the annual load of nitrogen,
and over half, perhaps as much as 70%, of the annual
total phosphorus load to the Fleet is estimated
to come from agricultural sources. In addition,
contributions from pigs and poultry were not included
in estimations of inputs from livestock, which might
make the agricultural load even more important to
the annual budget. The two sewage works at Abbotsbury
and Langton Herring may contribute as much as 40%
of the annual phosphorus load to the Fleet, but
this figure may be as low as 12%. Mute swans and
feeding from the swannery and other bird species
do not appear to be making a major contribution
to nutrient loads entering the lagoon as a whole
but they may be important in the Abbotsbury sub-catchment.
Further work:
More detailed modelling was recommended to gain
a better understanding of the spatial and seasonal
distribution of loads and the effects on water quality
within the Fleet. The immediate identification and
implementation of practical control measures across
the catchment, using catchment walk overs to identify
critical practices and run-off pathways, was also
recommended. Further modelling will eventually help
to focus attention on high risk areas and will help
to predict the likely effect of control measures
on nutrient status and eutrophication risk. Improved
information on the loads entering the Fleet via
point sources, feeder streams, direct run-off and
groundwater seepage is also recommended. It should
be borne in mind, however, that the above studies
are approximate calculations of annual
nutrient inputs. The timing and availability of
loads from different sources may alter the ecological
importance ascribed to different human activities.
Next section
References
|