Monitoring and surveillance options
Introduction
The management of Marine SACs is intended to minimise the impact of
human activities on the site, especially those features with conservation value and
respective conservation objectives. Each site will need a programme to monitor the
condition of interest features and assess the effectiveness of management measures. Such
programmes should therefore provide sufficient information to determine the expected
condition of shores in the absence of major human impacts. They should then regularly
assess the condition of shores to check for degradation or change. They should also
determine whether activities close to or within the SAC are having an impact on the
shores.
The study of rocky shores has a long history testing ideas about ecology and recovery.
Several features of rocky shores have made them ideal systems for developing and testing
ideas about ecology. It has also been recognised that monitoring rocky shore communities
is a convenient method for assessing various environmental impacts. As a consequence,
numerous monitoring and surveillance options exist (see Lewis, 1976; Hiscock, 1985; Baker
and Wolff, 1986; Raffaelli and Hawkins, 1996). Following from the SACs biological
monitoring handbook (Hiscock, 1998), surveillance is defined as "a procedure by which
a series of surveys is conducted in a sufficiently rigorous manner for changes in the
attributes of a site (or species) to be detected over a period of time". Monitoring
is defined as "surveillance undertaken to ensure that formulated standards are being
maintained" (Hellawell, 1978), with the standards determined in advance. This chapter
discusses the need for surveillance and monitoring of rocky shores and outlines some of
the options available.
It is emphasised that the appropriate method can be chosen only after
careful consideration of the question being addressed and the resources available.
Consideration must be given to the scale, frequency, timing and resolution of surveys.
Wherever possible monitoring should be undertaken in a hypothesis testing framework to
disprove no change if testing for changes, or disprove changes if seeking to demonstrate
no change.
General Considerations
Measurement
of physical characteristics
Measuring biological
attributes
Monitoring
to detect impacts
References
|