Summary of environmental impacts
The magnitude of potential environmental impacts
caused by boating facilities developments depends on factors
such as the actual location of the development, the scale of
the scheme, construction methods and project design and implementation.
Those marina developments that irreversibly
modify existing natural habitats are likely to cause the most
significant impacts. In particular, where land claim is part
of the development, the potential to modify the habitat is greater.
Isolated swing moorings and limited pontoon
provision are likely to have the least relative impact, although
their cumulative impact may be more significant in the vicinity
of those features which are already experiencing stress from
other sources, such as agriculture, industry and also other
recreational activities.
Dredging may induce turbidity which, depending
on the scale, may affect tidal regimes.
In addition, deep dredging may disturb large benthic
communities on the sea bed, although evidence of long term impact
is limited.
There is a trade off between maintaining adequate
flushing characteristics of marina basins by dredging and causing
increases in turbidity by the dredging operation.
The disposal of dredge spoil may have the beneficial
result of removing contaminants from marine sediment, many of
which are from industrial and agricultural sources, although
the location of disposal is an important issue as is the resuspension
of the contaminants in the water column.
Disposal may also cause potential problems
associated with the smothering of sea bed communities.
Evidence suggests that water quality in a low
flushing marina basin can undergo a number of changes. In particular,
water temperature may increase, dissolved oxygen levels may
decrease, and there may be increases in certain pollutants such
as copper from antifouling paints.
Terrestrial and non-marine invertebrates, abundant
in sand dunes and salt marshes, are unlikely to be effected
by marina and other facilities development unless the construction
involves significant modification of their habitats through
land claim.
Aquatic estuarine communities, including algae,
worms and molluscs, are greatly affected by the loss of estuarine
area through land claim and locked basins. This also has a detrimental
effect on fish and bird populations which feed on the organisms.
The impact of boating facilities’ operations
is dependent to a large degree on the nature of the management
procedures on site.
The provision of adequate facilities for the
reception of various wastes, the adoption of run-off minimisation
strategies and effective general site management can all improve
the environmental performance of a facility.
Quantities of antifouling paint may enter the
water in the vicinity of boat lift out areas, where craft are
washed down, and in maintenance areas, where craft are scraped.
These activities can remove a large amount of paint which invariably
enters water from the landside. Where present in significant
concentrations, the biocides have implications for marine organisms,
although there is limited data available to confirm the nature
and scale of such impacts.
An existing slipway may have a continuing impact
on a feature, site designation suggests that the site can support
the facility at its current level and type of use. However,
if usage levels of the facility increase greater impacts may
occur, such increase therefore require close monitoring.
Issue
|
mSAC Feature
|
|
Low flushing estuaries
|
Fast flushing estuaries
|
Mud and sand flats not covered by sea water at low tide
|
Sandbanks which are slightly covered by sea water at
all times
|
Low flushing large shallow inlets and bays
|
Fast flushing large shallow inlets and bays
|
Reefs (if water is deep enough to accommodate facilities)
|
Lagoons
|
Submerged or partly submerged sea caves
|
Grey seal
|
Common seal
|
Bottlenose dolphin
|
Construction of new in-water facility
|
m
|
m
|
|
|
m
|
m
|
w
|
|
|
w
|
w
|
w
|
Existing swing mooring berthing1
|
m
|
m
|
w
2
|
m
|
m
|
m
|
m
|
m
|
|
m
|
m
|
m
|
Capital Dredging
|
l
|
l
|
l
|
l
|
l
|
l
|
l
|
l
|
|
m
|
m
|
m
|
Maintenance Dredging
|
w
|
w
|
w
|
w
|
w
|
w
|
w
|
w
|
|
m
|
m
|
m
|
Noise disturbance3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
w
|
w
|
w
|
Antifouling paint concentration around facility4
|
w
|
w
|
w
|
w
|
w
|
w
|
w
|
w
|
|
m
|
m
|
m
|
Sewage and other discharges5
|
w
|
m
|
m
|
m
|
w
|
m
|
m
|
m
|
|
w
|
w
|
w
|
Disturbance to wildlife6
|
w
*
|
w
*
|
w
*
|
m
|
w
*
|
w
*
|
|
w
|
|
w
*
|
w
*
|
m
|
Erosion and turbidity7
|
w
|
m
|
m
|
m
|
w
|
w
|
w
|
w
|
|
m
|
m
|
m
|
Key to impacts
Blank Squares - not applicable
m - minimal
w - observable,
likely to be location specific
w * - observable
at certain times, minimal at other times
l - appreciable,
although depends upon scale of operation
Notes
-
anchor drag and maintenance activities
carried out at low tide
-
this refers specifically to the impact
of maintenance activities such as hull scraping on mud banks
at low tide
-
impact of operations at facility, not including
impacts of construction
-
concentrations of biocide in the vicinity
of facility, not including general impacts of antifouling
paints
-
concentrations of sewage and other discharge
in the vicinity of facility, not including general impacts
-
disturbance to wildlife during operation
of facility, not including impacts of construction
-
impacts due to operation of facility, not
including general impacts of recreational activities
Next Section
|