|
Summaries of reviewed publications – references
41 – 45.
Details are limited to information relevant to
the UK marine habitats and species listed in the
Habitats Directive and the Birds Directive.
[pr] indicates that the paper is from a peer reviewed
journal or report
Natura 2000 Habitats &
Species
|
Fishing Technique
|
Effects
|
Locations
|
Reference
|
REF: 41
Harbour porpoise
Bottlenose dolphin
Grey seal
Common seal
|
Fish farming, fisheries in general
|
Review paper
Seals are still killed around the Scottish
coast where they interact with fishing or
fish farming interests but it is difficult
to assess the impact. Probably localised and
limited in extent, but could have a significant
effect on some local populations. Seals and
cetaceans may be caught accidentally in fishing
gear and anti-predator nets around fish farms.
Grey and common seals, harbour porpoises and
common dolphins are the most commonly caught
species in UK waters. Currently the assessment
of the significance of the potential threats
is hampered by lack of data on the nature
of the threats and the dynamics of the populations
concerned.
|
Scottish waters
|
Thompson P.M. (1992). The conservation of
marine mammals in Scottish waters. Proceedings
of the Royal Society of Edinburgh.
100B: 123-140
[PR]
|
REF: 42
Shallow inlets and bays
Sandbanks
(Mixed sediment chiefly sand
and shell gravel with varying quantities of
silt, shells, gravel, stones and cobbles)
|
Scallop dredging
|
Pre-dredging surface followed by qualitative
and quantitative assessments (although not
at the same stations), photographs and sediment
samples.
Habitat effects - Conspicuous tracks
on the seabed about 4m wide. At each site
a ridge of stones, shells and shell fragments
approx. 15cm high and 30cm wide. Inside ridges
shallow grooves formed by rubber bobbins at
the ends of the towing beam. Examination of
tubes of the anemone Cerianthus lloydii
in the dredge paths suggested top 2-4cm had
been removed. Passage of dredge created a
thick sediment cloud the heaviest constituents
of which settle out rapidly and close by.
Fine sediments were carried away by the tide.
Species and Community effects - Dredge
bags contained shells and stones most of which
supported sponges, hydroids, small anemones,
tube-worms, barnacles, ascidians and bryozoans.
Remains of several P. folicacea and
large numbers of small crustaceans (chiefly
Pilumnus hirtellus), molluscs (especially
Trivia spp.) and juvenile echinoderms
within the folds of the colonies. Also several
sponges (mostly Suberites spp.) and
a large number of epibenthic echinoderm species
in the catch. Predators and tidal currents
removed much evidence of killed or injured
animals in the 24 hours after dredging but
dead or damaged tubeworms, crabs, squat lobsters
echinoderms and P. foliacea were found.
Large numbers of C. lloydii present
in dredge path. Broken tops of l. conchilega
tubes were common in dredge paths but large
numbers of intact tubes suggested that the
worms had survived and rebuilt their tubes.
Large mobile epifauna generally absent from
dredge path except for occasional scavenging
A. rubens although within 48hrs smaller
mobile species such as hermit crabs were present.
Counts of infauna in and immediately alongside
dredge paths showed these species were unaffected
by the level of dredging. Sessile species
found during presurvey but not seen in dredge
paths include "shell fauna", C. celata,
Suberities spp. A. digitatum and
P. foliacea
|
Skomer
|
Bullimore, B. (1985). An investigation into
the effects of scallop dredging within the
Skomer Marine Reserve. Skomer Marine Reserve
Subtidal Monitoring Project. Report to the
Nature Conservation Council.
|
REF: 43
Lagoons
Harbour porpoise
Bottlenose dolphin
Grey seal
Common seal
|
Gill nets (including trammel nets and tangle
nets)
|
Report on the nature and scale of European
gill net fisheries and review of accidental
catches of non-target species. Incidental
catches reported for common dolphins, bottlenose
dolphin, striped dolphin, harbour porpoise,
common seal, grey seal, sharks (especially
blue sharks), loggerhead turtles, guillemot,
razorbill, shag and loon.
Around the UK catches of grey seals in tangle
net fisheries high in the Barra fishery and
for Cornwall appeared to be higher than other
areas. Catches of common dolphins often reported
in southwest fisheries amounting to perhaps
some hundreds per year. Bottlenose dolphins
rarely recorded but porpoises fairly frequently
found in gill net fisheries especially in
the North Sea. Drift net fisheries catch most
but most of these are released alive. Total
drownings in gill nets throughout the country
may be in high tens to low hundreds. Impact
on porpoise population not known. Bird catches
widely reported but little studied. Catches
of non-target fish poorly known but crabs
are taken in very large numbers.
Regarding impact on marine mammals the study
clarified importance of North Sea cod fishery
and Atlantic hake fishery both already suspected
of taking significant number of harbour porpoises
and common dolphins respectively. With no
populations studies on this species in Europe
the impacts of these fisheries and the recently
implemented tuna drift net fishery, remain
speculative. There are apparently significant
catches of birds in the salmon driftnet fisheries
in Ireland and Denmark and catches in coastal
and lagoon fisheries in Portugal and Italy.
It has been estimated that breeding populations
of guillemots at two sites in northern Norway
have declined by 95% from the early 1960's
to 1989 and that this decline could be explained
entirely by gill net mortalities based on
observed catch rates.
Impacts on non-target fish poorly documented,
but where examined a wide variety of species
recorded. Probably most acutely seen in the
swordfish driftnet fishery. May be an impact
on benthic communities because of cumulative
effect of exposure to netting (including lost
netting) on certain seaweeds, seagrass or
pedunculate invertebrate communities may be
important but little investigated.
|
European Community waters
|
Northridge S. di Natale A., Kinze C., Lankester
K., Ortiz de ZarateV. & Sequeira M. (1991).
Gill net fisheries in the European Community
and their impacts on the marine environment.
MRAG Ltd. A report to the European Commission’s
Directorate General Environment.
|
REF: 44
Shallow inlets and bays
Sandbanks
(Gravel sediment)
|
Scallop dredging
Otter trawling
|
Habitat effects
- small differences in sediment type between
dredged and undredged sites with dredged sites
having a slightly higher frequency of small
pebbles, and the undredged sites having slightly
more larger pebbles and cobbles.
Species and community effects - Samples
of benthic megafauna from disturbed and undisturbed
sites showed that disturbed sites had lower
density of organisms, biomass, and species
diversity than undisturbed sites. Many of
the species that were absent or less common
in dredge sites were small, fragile polychaetes,
shrimps and brittlestars. Most apparent difference
was the lack of colonial, epifaunal taxa at
the disturbed site. This study aimed to give
a quantitative assessment of the impact using
still photographs.
Comparison of deep sites showed that Filograna
implexa had a high percentage cover at
the undredged site and no epifauna and few
animals visible at the dredged site. Significant
effect between depth and dredging for both
F. implexa and plant-like animals with
effect on percentage cover greater at the
deep sites. For plant-like animals the effect
was higher at the shallow sites. Protula
tubularia was significantly more abundant
at undredged than dredged sites. There were
no differences in the proportion of photographic
sampling cells with bryozoans in them, but
dredged sites had a significantly higher proportion
of cells with abundant bryozoans than undredged
sites. Spirorbis was more abundant
at the deep sites and was in higher frequencies
at the dredged sites than undredged sites.
Most likely explanation is that the emergent
epifauna at undredged sites concealed encrusting
bryozoans and Spirorbis from view.
Depth had the greatest effect on the frequencies
of non-colonial animals. Dredging had a lesser,
but still significant effect on the frequencies
of non-colonial species. Undredged sites had
higher frequencies of almost all taxa except
burrowing anemones, the earshell Sinum
perspectivum and hermit crabs. Most of
the non-colonial taxa seemed to be negatively
affected by dredging but some seemed to profit
from dredging. Burrowing anemones were more
prevalent at dredged sites for example, perhaps
because tentacles easily retracted to safety.
Results consistent with the hypothesis that
gravel habitats are very sensitive to physical
disturbance by bottom fishing and the primary
impact is the removal of emergent epifaunal
taxa.
|
Georges Bank, Canada
|
Collie J.S., Escanero G.A. & Hunke L.
(1996). Scallop dredging on Georges Bank:
Photographic evaluation of effects on benthic
epifauna. ICES CM. 1996/Mini: 9
|
REF: 45
Shallow inlets and bays
Estuaries
Mudflats and sandflats
Sandbanks
Grey seal
Common seal
Harbour porpoise
Bottlenose dolphin
Seabirds
|
Various
|
Review report describing direct effects of
fishing.
Habitat effects - all towed gears
which exploit bottom-living species disturb
the sediment and may therefore have an impact
on the structure and processes at the seabed.
Grain size distribution, sediment porosity
and chemical exchange process are properties
which may be affected. Another direct consequence
is displacement of boulders which would otherwise
be a surface for epifauna. A direct consequence
of disturbance is an increase in suspended
sediment load and the possibility of net transport
of finer sediments. Resuspension may also
influence uptake or release of contaminants,
a shift in sediment-water exchange eg of nutrients.
Reworking of sediments may result in burial
of organic matter. Gears which disrupt the
sediment most are beam trawls and shellfish
dredges but method of rigging can have a profound
effect on the level of disturbance.
Species and Community effects - Box
cores revealed extensive changes to infauna
before and after trawling. Significant reduction
in burrowing sea urchin and the density of
tube-building polychaetes. Survival rates
for infauna and epifauna caught in net of
beam trawl were high for starfish, many molluscs
and crabs but poor for Arctica islandica.
Trawl-caught whelks and hermit crabs largely
unaffected. These results suggested that a
relatively high proportion of some benthic
species can be killed in the path of a beam
trawling. In relation to scallop dredging
epibenthic mortalities can be marked. Effects
on seabed and benthos depend on substrate
type, hydrographic features and community
structure as well as the design and operation
characteristics of the gears. Seabirds have
been killed in gill and other static nets,
no comprehensive studies of entanglement in
the North Sea but available evidence indicates
that it is likely to occur for diving birds
in areas with fixed net fisheries. Gill net
fisheries in some places have had a high by-catch
of diving birds. Seals may be caught in gill
nets, fyke nets and fixed nets for salmon.
Gill nets killed the most cetaceans, catch
rates varying seasonally. Around the British
Isles several species of small cetacean have
been reported as incidental catches but in
the North Sea reported by-catches of species
other than harbour porpoise are rare. As well
as catch, fishing operations cause incidental
mortality of fish which escape from the gear.
Gill nets, tangle nets and traps may continue
to fish for some time after being lost of
discarded. Length of time depends on factors
such as current speed and fouling. On the
bottom multifilament nets remain tangled,
monofilament nets may, once clear of fish
remains and crabs, disentangle, return to
an upright position and resume fishing. Over
time they build up an encrusting layer of
marine organisms and become more visible to
fish. Fragments of nets of all types may also
entrap seabirds and marine mammals.
|
North East Atlantic, North Sea, Irish Sea
|
ICES (1992) Report of the study group on
ecosystem effects of fishing activities. ICES
C.M. 1992/G:11.
[PR]
|
Next Section
|